On April 14, 1985, about a thousand people gathered at the California
Institute of Technology sports field in Pasadena to see a demonstration of one
of the most mysterious of human feats – walking on red-hot coals. By the end of
the afternoon 125 of the audience had themselves walked through a pit of fire
with a temperature that reached 1,400F.
None had any special training or preparation for the event.
None had been hypnotized, and none were in a state of religious or mystical
ecstasy. They were just ordinary people.
The usual explanation has been that the powerful rituals
preceding the fire walk and the unshakable religious beliefs of the
participants have somehow created the conditions for mind to control matter. In
this case the matter is human flesh, which the mind makes fireproof.
Citing this premise, a number of self-help groups in the
United States and in Europe have proclaimed that they can train people to have
total mental control of the body. The results, they claim, include the ability
to defeat cancer without drugs, to cure impotence, defeat depression, or
restore failing eyesight. What is the proof that such miracles are possible?
The fact is that people have ben seen to gain such remarkable mental control
that they can walk over coals unharmed.
Strangely enough, it was to disprove such claims that two
University of California scientists, Dr. Bernard Leikind, a plasma physicist,
and Dr. William McCarthy, a psychologist had arranged the demonstration at the
sports field in Pasadena. They said that anyone can fire walk,and that
paranormal powers have nothing to do with it.
Leikind insists that the coals used in fire walks are more
like the hot air in an oven than like the cake pan. They simply do not contain
enough thermal energy to burn the soles of the feet in the short time it takes
to walk the length of the pit. He points out, too, that fire walkers frequently
perform with wet feet; the dampness acts as an extra insulation against burns.
Not everyone, however, is convinced by this explanation
Commentators have pointed out that, like the self-help groups and the priests
at religious rituals, Leikind first persuaded his audience in California that walking
on fire was easy. Although he used the language of science, whereas others have
used psychological and emotional terms, he was still aiming to induce a
“fireproof” mentality in his audience. Leikind may have succeeded in a way that
he did not intend.
No comments:
Post a Comment