In 1995, when she was about eighteen months old, Shukla
Gupta of the village of Kampu in West Bengal began to cradle her pillow and
call it Minu. When asked who Minu was, Shukla would reply, “My daughter.”
Shukla asked to be taken to Rathtala, but her family had
never heard of this district, Shukla said that she could show them the way
herself. Then her father discovered that Rathtala did exist and that someone
named Khetu did live there. Investigation revealed that Khetu had a
sisiter-in-law named Mana; she had died some years before, leaving a small
child, Minu. His curiosity aroused, Shukla’s father arranged for the two
families to meet.
When Shukla and her parents arrived in Rathtala in the
summer of 1959, Shukla led the way to the house of the people she had mentioned
over the years. It was especially striking that she addressed her
brother-in-law as Karuna; everyone else called him Kutu. Even close neighbours
did not know his true name.
Shukla recognized many of the objects in the house and
picked out Mana’s sarees from a trunkful of clothes that had belonged to a
number of other people. She showed extraordinary affection for her husband and
for Minu.
Subsequent inquires revealed no history of fraud in either
family; nor any motive for fraud.
The case of Shukla is one of hundreds in the files of
Professor Ian Stevenson of the University of Virginia. For more than a quarter
of a century, Stevenson has been investigating cases in which children recall
the homes, work, and families of individuals unknown to them in this life, and
sometimes long dead. Stevenson suggests that these may be genuine instances of
reincarnation.
However, two Dutch researchers, Titus and Esteban Rivers
have questioned many of Stevenson’s cases. In particular, they point out that
in many instances the alleged former incarnation belonged, or was known to, the
family of the claimant, who may have simply remembered information stored
subconsciously.
Of the hundreds of examples in Stevenson’s files, only two,
in addition to that of Shukla, pass the test of the dubious Dutchmen. These,
they believe, may be instances of “real reincarnation memories.”
Born in 1955, Kumkum Verma had never been away from her
village of Behara, 25 miles from Darbhanga. When she was about 3 ½ years old,
she began to talk about a previous life. She had lived in Urdu Bazar, a
district of Darbhanga, and had married a blacksmith, from a lower caste than
that of her present father, a doctor. Kumkum had had a son named Mishri Lal,
who had also become a blacksmith, and a grandson, Gouri Shankar. She said that her daughter-in-law
had poisoned her during an altercation.
Often, while talking about her previous life, Kumkum would
say, “Call me Sunnary,” which means “beautiful”, or so her family thought.
Anxious to know the truth, in 1959 Dr. Verma discovered that Mishri Lal really
was a blacksmith in Urdu Bazar and had a son named Gouri Shankar. His mother’s
name had been Sundari, which he pronounced “Sunnary”.
Mishri Lal confirmed everything that Kumkum had said.
Sundari had ben born about 1900 and died in 1950. She married and had two sons,
one of them Mishri Lal. About five years after her husband’s death she again
married.
It was not a happy union, and Mishri Lal became convinced
that his stepfather and called his mother as a witness in the case. But before
the trial date she suddenly died. These and a host of other details of
Sundari’s life that Kumkum described were also confirmed by independent
investigators. Stevenson could discover no suspicious motive behind Kumkum’s
story and no previous connection between the families.
Born in central Ceylon (Sri Lanka today) in 1956,
Gnanatilleka Baddewithana confused her parents when she was a year old by
saying that she had “another” mother and father. By the time she was two, she
had made it clear that these parents were from another existence.
Gnanatilleka gave details of their village, Talawakele, in a
remote highland location only 16 miles away. She also named her two former
brothers and sisters. She herself, she said, had been a boy.
A local priest who heard of Gnanatilleka’s claims identified
the family that she had described, Fifteen months before Gnanatilleka had been
born, one of their children had died, a boy named Tillekeratne. In 1961,
arrangements were made for Gnanatilleka to go to Talawakele to meet the family.
She correctly recognized seven of Tillekeratne’s family and
two people from the village, whom she picked out unprompted in a crowd. She
delightedly embraced her former mother and former teacher, whom she especially
remembered for his gentleness. And Gnanatilleka showed the same warmth or
hostility as had Tillekeratne toward individual members of the family.
There were other striking correspondences. Tillekeratne had
been markedly effeminate; Gnanatilleka’s parents think she is slightly
masculine. Both children share the same favourite colour, blue. Tillekeratne
suffered a fall that contributed to his death; Gnanatilleka avoids heights and
has a district fear of anything medical.
Once again Stevenson could find no motive for fraud and no
evidence of contact between thefamilies. And once again even the skeptics had
to agree on the onlt plausible explanation Gnanatilleka was telling the truth.
No comments:
Post a Comment